SVR.JS vs Jaisocx: Comparing two web servers

SVR.JS vs Jaisocx: Comparing two web servers

Published on: December 21, 2024

Jaisocx is a web server built on Java that can run PHP web applications and supports HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3.

SVR.JS is a web server running on Node.JS, that can also host static and dynamic content. It supports CGI, FastCGI, SCGI, JSGI, and PHP for dynamic content. It supports HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.

In this post, we will compare SVR.JS with Jaisocx, and conclude which one is better suited for your websites and web applications.

What is SVR.JS?

SVR.JS is a free (as in freedom) web server built on Node.JS, designed to handle both static and dynamic content efficiently. It offers scalability, security, and configurability, making it suitable for various web hosting needs.

Key Features:

  • Scalability: Utilizes Node.JS's event-driven architecture and supports clustering to manage high request loads effectively.
  • Security: Includes URL sanitization, protection against brute force attacks on HTTP authentication, and a built-in block list to guard against malicious actors.
  • Configurability: Allows customization through a config.json file and supports the installation of mods to extend server functionality.
  • Server-Side JavaScript: Enables the execution of server-side JavaScript, facilitating dynamic web application development.
  • Protocol Support: Offers HTTPS and HTTP/2 support, ensuring secure and efficient communication.
  • Compression: Provides Brotli, gzip, and Deflate HTTP compression to optimize content delivery.
  • Authentication: Supports HTTP basic authentication for access control.
  • Gateway Interfaces: Compatible with CGI, SCGI, JSGI, and PHP, allowing integration with various technologies.

SVR.JS is licensed under the MIT License, ensuring freedom from proprietary software constraints. It is actively maintained, with the latest version (as of time of writing) being 4.4.0.

What is Jaisocx?

Jaisocx is a free (gratis) web server designed to facilitate the publication of dynamic websites. It supports multiple HTTP protocols, including HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3, ensuring compatibility with modern web standards. The server offers features such as HTTPS support with free TLS certificates via Certbot, security measures like JSON Web Token (JWT) authorization, and capabilities for SQL-to-JSON data handling. Additionally, Jaisocx provides traffic compression through gzip, caching mechanisms, and user-friendly configuration via XML files. It is compatible with various operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, and Docker environments.

Developers can utilize Jaisocx to host applications built with frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, Angular, React, and Vue.js. The server's GitHub repositories offer dockerized setups for these frameworks, facilitating streamlined deployment processes.

OS compatibility

SVR.JS can run on multiple platforms (like Windows Server, GNU/Linux), as it is built on Node.JS. SVR.JS is effectively a JavaScript script that runs on server-side with Node.JS.

Jaisocx can also run on multiple platforms (like Windows Server, GNU/Linux), as it is built on Java. Jaisocx is effectively a JAR file containing the bytecode that is executed by Java.

Configuration format

SVR.JS and Jaisocx are both web servers designed to handle web content, but they differ significantly in their configuration approaches.

SVR.JS uses a config.json file for its configuration, allowing users to define server settings in JSON format. This file specifies parameters such as ports, security settings, and paths. Some SVR.JS mods may use separate configuration files in JSON format.

Jaisocx utilizes XML files for its configuration. The main configuration file, specified in the server.properties file, defines server endpoints, domains, and resources. This structured approach allows for detailed customization of server behavior.

To sum it up, Jaisocx uses XML for configuration, providing a hierarchical and descriptive setup, while SVR.JS uses JSON, which is lightweight and widely used in JavaScript environments.

Security features

Both SVR.JS and Jaisocx are web servers that prioritize security, each offering distinct features to protect web applications. Here's a comparison of their security capabilities:

SVR.JS:

  • URL sanitation - sanitizes URLs to prevent malicious inputs from exploiting vulnerabilities in the web application.
  • Brute force attack protection - protects against brute force attacks on HTTP authentication, enhancing the security of user credentia
  • Built-in block list - features a built-in block list to deny access to known malicious actors, preventing potential attacks.
  • HTTPS and HTTP/2 Support - supports HTTPS and HTTP/2 protocols, ensuring secure and efficient communication between the server and clients.

Jaisocx:

  • HTTPS support - facilitates secure communication by supporting HTTPS.
  • Free TLS certificates - includes a script to easily obtain free TLS certificates via Certbot, simplifying the process of securing your web applications.
  • JSON Web Token (JWT) authorization - allows protection of sensitive content, such as SQL-to-JSON endpoints, using JSON Web Tokens, enabling developers to restrict access to trusted users.
  • Support for latest HTTP protocols - supports HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and the latest HTTP/3 protocols, ensuring compatibility with modern web standards and enhancing security and performance.

Comparison:

  • HTTPS support - both servers support HTTPS, providing encrypted communication channels.
  • Advanced protocols: Jaisocx supports HTTP/3 in addition to HTTP/2, while SVR.JS supports up to HTTP/2.
  • Authorization mechanisms - Jaisocx offers JWT authorization for fine-grained access control, whereas SVR.JS focuses on URL sanitization and brute force protection.
  • Additional security measures - SVR.JS includes a built-in block list to manage and block malicious actors, a feature not specified for Jaisocx.

Both Jaisocx and SVR.JS provide robust security features tailored to different needs. Jaisocx emphasizes modern protocol support and JWT-based authorization, making it suitable for applications requiring advanced access control and compatibility with the latest web standards. SVR.JS focuses on input sanitization, brute force protection, and managing malicious actors, catering to applications that prioritize defense against common web threats.

Feature set

Jaisocx and SVR.JS are both web servers designed to facilitate web hosting and development, each offering a distinct set of features tailored to different programming environments and use cases. Here's a comparative overview of their functionalities:

Programming Environment:

  • SVR.JS: Built on Node.JS, enabling server-side JavaScript execution, which is ideal for JavaScript-centric web development. SVR.JS can also work with PHP applications.
  • Jaisocx: Primarily designed for PHP applications, providing robust support for PHP-based web hosting.

Protocol Support:

  • SVR.JS: Offers support for HTTP/2, enhancing performance for modern web applications.
  • Jaisocx: Supports HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3, automatically selecting the optimal protocol based on client capabilities.

Security Features:

  • SVR.JS: Includes HTTPS support, URL sanitation, protection against brute force attacks on HTTP authentication, and a built-in block list for malicious actors.
  • Jaisocx: Provides HTTPS support with free TLS certificates via Certbot, and includes mechanisms for Basic Authentication and JSON Web Tokens (JWT) for authorization.

Proxy Functionality:

  • SVR.JS: Supports reverse proxy functionality through the reverse-proxy-mod and forward proxy functionality via the forward-proxy-mod, extending its versatility in network configurations.
  • Jaisocx: Allows the creation of proxy endpoints by configuring alias tags with the "proxy" attribute, enabling seamless proxying to other hosts.

Compression and Content Delivery:

  • SVR.JS: Supports Brotli, gzip, and Deflate HTTP compression, improving content delivery efficiency.
  • Jaisocx: Supports gzip HTTP compression, improving content delivery efficiency.

Extensibility and Modularity:

  • SVR.JS: Highly configurable via a config.json file, supports server-side JavaScript, and allows the installation of mods to expand server functionality, providing flexibility for developers.
  • Jaisocx: Offers Docker support with images and sample setups for frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, and WordPress, streamlining deployment processes.

Documentation and Community Support:

  • SVR.JS: Offers detailed documentation and has an active community presence, with resources available for installation, configuration, and development.
  • Jaisocx: Provides comprehensive documentation covering installation, configuration, and usage across different operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, and Docker environments.

Jaisocx is tailored for PHP applications with features supporting modern protocols and security measures, making it suitable for PHP-centric environments. SVR.JS, built on Node.JS, offers extensive configurability, security features, and support for server-side JavaScript, catering to developers seeking a JavaScript-based web server solution.

Ease of use

Jaisocx and SVR.JS are both web servers designed to simplify the deployment of web applications, each with its own approach to ease of use.

SVR.JS:

SVR.JS is an open-source web server built on Node.js, designed to handle high loads with scalability and security in mind. It supports both static and dynamic content, offering features like server-side JavaScript execution, URL sanitization, and brute force protection. The server is configurable through a config.json file and supports the installation of modules to extend its functionality. SVR.JS also provides an integrated log viewer, log highlighter, and user management tools.

Jaisocx:

Jaisocx is a free PHP web server that emphasizes a transparent and user-friendly XML configuration system. This design choice allows developers to easily configure web application endpoints without extensive setup. The server's documentation provides comprehensive guidance on publishing various types of content, including static websites, WordPress applications, and frameworks like Angular, React, and Vue.js. It also offers instructions for setting up secure HTTPS connections using free certificates and configuring SQL-to-JSON endpoints.

Comparison:

  • Configuration - Jaisocx utilizes an XML-based configuration system, which some developers find straightforward for setting up web applications. SVR.JS, on the other hand, uses a JSON configuration file, which may appeal to those familiar with JSON syntax.
  • Content Support - Jaisocx is tailored for PHP applications and offers specific guidance for deploying various PHP-based frameworks and content types. SVR.JS supports both static and dynamic content, including server-side JavaScript execution, making it versatile for a range of web applications.
  • Security Features - SVR.JS includes built-in security features such as URL sanitization and brute force protection, which can enhance the security of web applications. Jaisocx provides options for securing URLs using Basic Authentication and JSON Web Tokens (JWT), offering flexibility in implementing security measures.
  • Scalability - SVR.JS is designed to handle high request loads and ensure server stability, making it suitable for applications that require scalability. Jaisocx focuses on ease of use and may be more suitable for smaller to medium-sized applications.

Both SVR.JS and Jaisocx aim to simplify web server deployment but cater to different needs. Jaisocx offers a straightforward setup for PHP applications with a user-friendly XML configuration system. SVR.JS provides a more versatile and scalable solution with built-in security features and support for server-side JavaScript execution. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your web application and your familiarity with the respective technologies.

Performance

Blog Image

In the benchmark we conducted, we evaluated the performance of three web servers: Jaisocx, SVR.JS, and Apache httpd, which we used as a reference point for comparison. The results of this benchmark provide valuable insights into the efficiency and speed of these web servers under various configurations.

From the data presented, it is evident that SVR.JS, when deployed on the Bun runtime and enhanced with the SVR.JS Cache mod, demonstrates performance levels that are comparable to those of the well-established Apache httpd. This finding is significant, as it suggests that SVR.JS can effectively handle web traffic and requests with a performance that rivals a widely used and trusted server like Apache httpd.

Moreover, even when we examined the performance of SVR.JS running on Node.JS from an Ubuntu environment—identified as the slowest configuration among all tested SVR.JS setups—it still outperformed Jaisocx running on OpenJDK from Ubuntu. Specifically, SVR.JS in this configuration achieved speeds approximately 7.2 times faster than Jaisocx, which was noted to be the fastest configuration available for Jaisocx in our tests. This stark contrast highlights the efficiency of SVR.JS, even in less optimized environments.

It is also worth mentioning that after completing the benchmarking process, we encountered a significant issue with the Jaisocx web server: it ceased to respond altogether. This failure raises concerns about the stability and reliability of Jaisocx under load, suggesting that while it may perform well in certain configurations, it may not be suitable for production environments where consistent uptime and responsiveness are critical.

Overall, the benchmark results underscore the competitive edge of SVR.JS, particularly when optimized with caching mechanisms, while also revealing potential limitations in the performance and reliability of Jaisocx. These findings can guide developers and system administrators in making informed decisions about which web server technology to adopt for their specific needs.

Support options

SVR.JS and Jaisocx are both web servers designed to host websites and web applications, each offering distinct features and support options.

SVR.JS has comprehensive guides and tutorials that are available on the official website. SVR.JS also actively engages with community through social media platforms like Mastodon, Bluesky, and X (Twitter). Server administrators can contact SVR.JS via the website or email for assistance. SVR.JS also has an official forum called "SVR.JS Community", where server administrators can ask questions and report problems with SVR.JS.

Jaisocx also has detailed guides that are available on the official website, including examples for deploying various PHP applications. Server administrators can contact Jaisocx via or email for assistance.

SVR.JS offers a robust support system that includes comprehensive guides and tutorials on its official website, active engagement with the community through social media platforms like Mastodon, Bluesky, and X (Twitter), and an official forum called "SVR.JS Community" for server administrators to ask questions and report issues. In contrast, Jaisocx provides detailed guides and examples for deploying PHP applications on its website, but its support options appear to be more limited, as it only offers email assistance without the same level of community engagement or dedicated forums for user interaction.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both SVR.JS and Jaisocx offer robust solutions for web hosting, each with its unique strengths and features tailored to different needs.

SVR.JS stands out for its scalability, security features, and versatility. Built on Node.JS, it excels in handling high request loads and provides extensive configurability through JSON files. Its support for server-side JavaScript, various gateway interfaces, and comprehensive security measures like URL sanitization and brute force protection make it a strong contender for modern web applications. Additionally, SVR.JS demonstrated impressive performance in benchmark tests, rivaling the well-established Apache httpd and significantly outperforming Jaisocx in various configurations. Its active community support and detailed documentation further enhance its appeal.

Jaisocx, on the other hand, is designed with a focus on PHP applications and offers robust support for modern HTTP protocols, including HTTP/3. Its user-friendly XML configuration system, support for free TLS certificates via Certbot, and JWT authorization make it a suitable choice for PHP-centric environments. However, the performance and stability issues observed during benchmarking raise concerns about its reliability under heavy load, which may limit its suitability for production environments.

Ultimately, the choice between SVR.JS and Jaisocx depends on your specific requirements. If you need a scalable, high-performance web server with extensive security features and support for PHP and server-side JavaScript, SVR.JS is the better option. For PHP-based applications requiring modern protocol support and straightforward configuration, Jaisocx may be more appropriate. Consider your application's needs, your familiarity with the technologies, and the level of community support when making your decision.